Throwing Shoulder Adaptations Are Not Related to Shoulder Injury or Pain: A Preliminary Report.

BACKGROUND: Overhead throwing in baseball and softball athletes induces shoulder adaptations theorized to increase risk of shoulder musculoskeletal injury (MSI) and/or pain due to range of motion (ROM) deficits. HYPOTHESIS: Shoulder ROM adaptations are associated with a higher risk for developing shoulder MSI and pain. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3. METHODS: A total of 60 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I athletes cleared for full athletic participation and free from upper extremity MSI in the last 4 weeks (age, 19.0 ± 1.2 years; weight, 82.1 ± 13.7 kg; height, 178.6 ± 11.2 cm; softball, n = 23; baseball, n = 37). Passive glenohumeral internal rotation (IR), external rotation (ER), and horizontal adduction (HA) ROM were measured with the scapula stabilized and used to categorize participants with/without external rotation gain (ERG), external rotation insufficiency (ERI), glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD), pathological GIRD, and posterior shoulder tightness (PST) before the competitive season. Groups were then compared to assess the incidence of shoulder MSI prospectively and prevalence of shoulder pain at the initial evaluation. RESULTS: Baseball and softball athletes demonstrated significantly less IR ROM in the dominant shoulder (50.6° ± 9.4°) compared with the nondominant shoulder (59.1° ± 8.6°; P < 0.01) and significantly more ER ROM (dominant, 104.6° ± 12.1°; nondominant, 97.7° ± 12.0°; P < 0.01). Incidence of shoulder MSI was 15% but was not significantly related to any shoulder adaptations. No significant relationship was found between prevalence of pain and any shoulder adaptations in the 27% of athletes with pain. CONCLUSION: Increased ER and decreased IR ROM adaptations in intercollegiate overhead throwing athletes do not appear to be correlated to risk of shoulder MSI or pain. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings of this level 3 prospective study provide clinicians working with overhead athletes information regarding shoulder MSI risk and pain. It is recommended that clinicians should not use ROM adaptations exclusively to determine increased risk of shoulder MSI.

Risk Factors for Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit in Adolescent Athletes: A Comparison of Overhead Sports and Non-overhead Sports.

Background A glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD) occurs in baseball players due to the repetitive pitching motion. However, few reports have addressed associations between GIRD and sports other than baseball. In this study, we investigated whether GIRD occurs in adolescent athletes playing overhead sports other than baseball, and also, the risk factors that cause GIRD in these sports were examined. Methods A total of 214 junior high school athletes who had undergone medical checks were evaluated. Seventy-five athletes playing sports requiring overhead motions were classified into the overhead sports group (39 tennis, 18 handball, 12 badminton, and 6 softball players). Eighty athletes participating in sports requiring the use of the upper limbs but not requiring frequent overhead motions were classified into the non-overhead sports group (31 kendo, 20 fencing, 19 basketball, and 10 table tennis players); 59 athletes who mainly did not use an upper limb were classified into the contact sports group (22 judo, 15 wrestling, 13 soccer, and 9 rugby football players). The range of shoulder motion (internal rotation, external rotation, and total arc), background factors, general laxity, and flexibility of the lower body were compared among the three groups. Results Thirty-four (16%) of 214 players were classified as having GIRD (internal rotation deficit >15°). Significantly more athletes had GIRD in the overhead sports group than in the other groups (p=0.007). The internal rotation deficit was significantly worse in the overhead sports group than in the other groups (p=0.006, p=0.02, respectively). Background factors, general laxity, and lower body flexibility did not differ significantly among the groups. Conclusion The sole risk factor for GIRD was participating in any sport that required overhead movements. Thus, not only baseball players, but also other athletes who participate in sports requiring overhead movements should receive correct information to prevent GIRD.

Professional tennis players suffer high prevalence of shoulder alterations during the season: a possible tennis shoulder syndrome.

PURPOSE: To analyze the shoulder alterations of professional tennis players during the competition season and to compare the differences between their dominant vs. non-dominant shoulders, as well as gender and age differences. METHODS: Two-hundred and seventy shoulders of (78 men and 57 women) professional active tennis players were assessed during 3 ATP and WTA tournaments. MAIN VARIABLES STUDIED: long head of biceps (LHB) tenderness and synovitis; glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD), total range of motion (TRM), external rotation (ER) and scapular dyskinesis (DK). Secondary variables: shoulder dominance, gender, age, training hours, ranking, type of backhand. LHB tenderness and synovitis were assessed by clinical and ultrasound examination, TRM with goniometer and DK by dynamic observation. RESULTS: LHB tenderness of the dominant shoulder was present in 35% of all players, being more prevalent in women (47.4%) than men (26.9%) p = 0.023. LHB synovitis of the dominant shoulder was present in 20.2% of all players without difference between genders (n.s). High prevalence of GIRD was found in both dominant (87.4%) and non-dominant (56.3%) shoulders, being more prevalent in the dominant shoulder p = 0.00005. TRM was decreased in both dominant (144.5° ± 20.2°) and non-dominant shoulders (161.2° ± 18.9°) p = 0.00005. ER was normal in dominant (93.8° + /9.3°) and non-dominant shoulders (93.4° + /8.4°) (n.s). DK was present in 57.7% of dominant and 45.9% of non-dominant shoulders (n.s). The combination of LHB alterations, GIRD and DK in the dominant shoulder was present in 13.3% of the participants. There were no significant differences between younger (< 22 years) vs older players (≥ 22 years). CONCLUSION: Professional tennis players actively playing suffer a high prevalence of LHB inflammation, GIRD, scapular dyskinesis and decreased TRM in their dominant and non-dominant shoulders. The LHB is a significant cause for anterior shoulder pain in this population. Women suffer more LHB tenderness than men. Young players are as affected as older players. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Risk Factors for, and Prediction of, Shoulder Pain in Young Badminton Players: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder pain (SP) caused by hitting the shuttlecock is common in young badminton players. The objectives of the present study were to predict the risk factors for SP in young badminton players, and to determine the optimal risk factor cut-off that best discriminates those players who are at higher risk of suffering from SP. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted with 45 under-17 badminton players who participated in the Spanish Championship. Data were collected on anthropometric age, sports history, sagittal spinal curves, range of motion (ROM) and maximum isometric strength of shoulder. After 12 months, players completed a SP history questionnaire. Bayesian Student's t-analysis, binary logistic regression analysis and ROC analysis were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 18 (47.4%) players reported at least one episode of SP. The shoulder internal rotation (SIR) ROM showed the strongest association (OR = 1.122; p = 0.035) with SP. The SIR ROM has an excellent ability to discriminate players at increased risk for SP (p = 0.001). The optimal cut-off for SIR ROM, which predicts players with an 81% probability of developing SP, was set at 55° (sensitivity = 75.0%, specificity = 83.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The young badminton players who had a shoulder internal rotation ROM of 55° or less have a higher risk of SP one year later.

¿Efectividad de la técnica de liberación miofacial en el aumento del rango articular en restricción glenohumeral? Una comparación con la kinesioterapia tradicional / Effectiveness of the myofascial release technique in increasing joint range in glenohumeral restriction? A comparison with traditional kinesiotherapy

OBJETIVO: comparar la kinesioterapia tradicional con la técnica miofacial en pacientes con restricción articular interna glenohumeral. MÉTODO: estudio comparativo de 8 pacientes en un grupo de intervención (GI) y kinésico (GC), durante 8 semanas. Se comparó el pre y post test del ROM interno glenohumeral en ambos grupos mediante t de student. RESULTADOS: el grupo de la técnica miofascial demostró una amento significativo de ROM interno glenohumeral de 15,2º (p < 0,001), mientras que el grupo control no fue significativo (p > 0,05) sólo de de 6,4º. CONCLUSIONES:Un tratamiento de terapia con la Técnicas Liberación Miofascial en pacientes con déficit rotacional interno de hombro es más eficaz para aumentar el rango de movimiento articular de rotación interna glenohumeral que una técnica tradicional y conservadora.

OBJETIVE: to compare traditional kinesiotherapy with myofacial technique in patients with glenohumeral internal joint restriction. METHODS: comparative study of 8 patients in an intervention (IG) and kinesiotherapy (CG) group for 8 weeks. The pre- and post-test of glenohumeral internal ROM in both groups was compared using Student's t-test. RESULTS: the myofascial technique group showed a significant increase in glenohumeral internal ROM of 15.2º (p < 0.001), while the control group was not significant (p > 0.05) only 6.4º. CONCLUSIONS: A therapy treatment with Myofascial Release Techniques in patients with shoulder internal rotational deficit is more effective in increasing glenohumeral internal rotational joint range of motion than a traditional, conservative technique.

Age-related differences in glenohumeral internal rotation deficit, humeral retrotorsion angle, and posterior shoulder tightness in baseball players.

BACKGROUND: Glenohumeral internal rotation deficit is generally recognized as a risk factor for throwing disability in baseball players. However, the pathology, timing of onset, role in the onset of humeral retrotorsion angle (HTA) and soft tissue extensibility (STE), and the relationship with age remain unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this cross-sectional study was to investigate age-related glenohumeral internal rotation deficit, HTA, and STE in Japanese baseball players and determine whether these factors correlate with throwing disability. METHODS: Participants were 172 male baseball players divided into a symptomatic group (n = 68) and an asymptomatic group (n = 104). The mean age at examination was 15.4 ± 3.2 (range, 8-22) years. Measurement items were range of motion of bilateral internal and external rotation at 90° abduction (2ndIR and 2ndER, respectively), bilateral HTA, and posterior shoulder muscle elasticity. Correlations of age, symptom, and dominance with these measurements were investigated, and significant bilateral differences in HTA and STE by age and symptom were analyzed. RESULTS: HTA and 2ndER of the dominant side were significantly greater than those of the nondominant side in those over the age of 13 years in both the asymptomatic and symptomatic groups. In contrast, 2ndIR of the dominant side was significantly smaller than that of the nondominant side in those over the age of 13 years in both the asymptomatic and symptomatic groups. The difference in HTA between the dominant and nondominant sides increased and then plateaued at 12° after the age of 16 years. STE was observed only in the symptomatic group, and the value of STE was significantly greater in players aged >16 years compared with that in players aged <12 years (P = .001). Muscle elasticity did not differ significantly between sides and showed no correlation with STE. CONCLUSIONS: The difference in HTA between the dominant and nondominant sides increased with age until 16 years old regardless of symptoms. STE in the dominant side was observed only in symptomatic baseball players after the age of 13 years and increased with age, plateauing around the age of 16 years. Posterior shoulder muscle elasticity was not indicated as a cause of STE.

GIRD syndrome in male handball and volleyball players: Is the decrease of total range of motion the turning point to pathology?

BACKGROUND: Adaptations in glenohumeral range of motion may affect overhead athletes and lead to shoulder pathologies. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD) and postero-superior impingement among male handball and volleyball players and the relationship between these pathologies and training level (amateur vs. professional), position (attack vs. no attack), experience (> 5 years vs. < 5 years) and sports. METHODS: Sixty-seven handball players and 67 volleyball players with a mean age of 25 [± 5] years were included. The range of motion including external and internal rotation in 90∘ abduction of the dominant and non-dominant shoulder was measured of each examined athlete. Visual analogue scale, disabilities of the shoulder and hand score, constant score and subjective shoulder value were recorded. The athletes were examined for postero-superior impingement and abduction force was measured with an isokinetic dynamometer. RESULTS: Internal rotation was significantly lower and external rotation was significantly greater in the dominant arm for both sports. 72% presented with GIRD. GIRD was more prevalent in athletes active for > 5 years (odds ratio (OR) 3), in those training > 3 times per week (OR 1.4) and in handball players (OR 2.7). 24% presented with postero-superior impingement. Players active for > 5 years (OR 1.22), professionals (OR 1.14), volleyball players (OR 1.19), offensive players (OR 2.2) and athletes with GIRD > 10∘ (OR 1.5) showed a higher prevalence of postero-superior impingement. CONCLUSION: GIRD is a common phenomenon in handball and volleyball players. Offensive players are frequently suffering from postero-superior impingement. GIRD > 10∘ leads in nearly 75% of the athletes to a decrease of total range of motion and a high rate of postero-superior impingement. Thus, a decreased range of motion seems to be the turning point from adaptation to pathology. Therefore, regular controls of range of motion and countermeasures by means of stretching the posterior shoulder joint should be integrated in the training content.

Reciprocal inhibition improves posterior shoulder tightness and shoulder range of motion in youth baseball players.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of reciprocal inhibition for posterior shoulder tightness (PST), internal rotation at 90° abduction (ABIR) limitation, and subacromial impingement in elementary and junior high school baseball players. METHODS: The present study included 290 elementary school and junior high school baseball players who were members of an organized baseball team and attended a medical checkup in 2014. Seventeen participants were excluded because they were left-handed. We applied a sit-up exercise as a tool of reciprocal inhibition to all participants. Before and after the sit-up exercise, we evaluated the shoulder range of motion (ROM) in external rotation at 90° abduction (ABER), ABIR, and horizontal flexion (HF) in both shoulders and the prevalence of subacromial impingement in the dominant shoulder. We defined PST as a ≧15°decrease in the HF angle of the dominant shoulder in comparison to the nondominant shoulder before the sit-up exercise and divided participants into two groups (the PST group and the non-PST groups). An independent t-test was performed to compare the shoulder ROM, and a chi-squared test was performed to compare the prevalence of subacromial impingement between the two groups. A dependent t-test was performed to compare intragroup changes in the shoulder ROM. The McNemar test was performed to compare intragroup changes in the prevalence of subacromial impingement. RESULTS: Fifty-six of 273 participants had PST in the initial examination. The initial examination revealed that the ROM of ABIR and HF in the dominant shoulder were significantly lower in the PST group than those in the non-PST group, whereas the ROM of ABER and total arc were significantly higher in the PST group. The prevalence of subacromial impingement in the PST group was significantly higher than that in the non-PST group. The sit-up exercise improved ABER, ABIR, total arc, HF, and the prevalence of subacromial impingement in both groups. However, the amount of ROM change did not differ between the two groups for any parameter with the exception of HF. CONCLUSION: The presence of PST affects the prevalence of subacromial impingement but was not related to the loss of ABIR or the prevalence of pathological glenohumeral internal rotation deficit. The sit-up exercise, as reciprocal inhibition, can transiently improve the prevalence of subacromial impingement via the improvement of PST.

Shoulder ranges of motion and humeral torsions of injured baseball players have different characteristics depending on their pitching sides.

BACKGROUND: Right- and left-side throwers in baseball may have different shoulder conditions and throwing biomechanics. This study aimed to compare the passive range of motion, humeral torsion, and clinical findings between right- and left-handed throwers who sustained throwing shoulder injuries and confirm the differences in the characteristics between throwing sides. METHODS: A total of 52 pitchers diagnosed with throwing shoulder injuries were included in this study: 27 patients were right-side throwers (R group), and 25 were left-side throwers (L group). We measured the bilateral passive external and internal rotation angles in abduction position (ABIR) and total arc at their first visit. To assess posterior shoulder tightness, the internal rotation angles in forward flexion (FIR), and the abduction angle (AA) and horizontal flexion angle (HFA) without scapula motion were measured. The bilateral humeral torsion angles were also measured using ultrasonography. These values were compared between the participants' throwing and non-throwing sides and between the R and L groups' throwing sides. Furthermore, several physical findings in the shoulders were assessed, and the positive ratio was compared between the R and L groups. RESULTS: On comparing the throwing and non-throwing sides, the R group had significantly greater external rotation angles in the abduction position and humeral torsion angle, and smaller ABIR, total arc, FIR, AA, and HFA in the throwing side, while the L group showed no significant differences, except for a smaller ABIR and larger HFA in the throwing side. On comparing the throwing side between the R and L groups, the R group had a smaller FIR, AA, and FHA than the L group. Regarding the physical findings, the posterior jerk test, Kim test, anterior and posterior drawer sign, sulcus sign, and scapular winging in the L group were significantly more positive than in the R group. CONCLUSION: The range of motion and humeral torsions differed between the left- and right-side throwers, as did the pathology between their throwing sides. Clinicians should consider the possibility that the pathological condition differs between left- and right-side throwers.

The Effect of Straight-Line Long-Toss Versus Ultra-Long-Toss Throwing on Passive Glenohumeral Range of Motion Recovery After Pitching.

BACKGROUND: Repetitive throwing in baseball pitchers can lead to pathologic changes in shoulder anatomy, range of motion (notably glenohumeral internal rotation deficit), and subsequent injury; however, the ideal strengthening, recovery, and maintenance protocol of the throwing shoulder in baseball remains unclear. Two strategies for throwing shoulder recovery from pitching are straight-line long-toss (SLT) throwing and ultra-long-toss (ULT) throwing, although neither is preferentially supported by empirical data. HYPOTHESIS: ULT will be more effective in returning baseline internal rotation as compared with SLT in collegiate pitchers after a pitching session. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3. METHODS: A total of 24 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I baseball pitchers with mean age 20.0 ± 1.1 years were randomized to either the ULT group (n = 13; 9 right-hand dominant, 4 left-hand dominant) or SLT group (n = 11; 10 right-hand dominant, 1 left-hand dominant). Measurements (dominant and nondominant, 90° abducted external rotation [ER], internal rotation [IR], and total range of motion [TROM]) were taken at 5 time points across 3 days: before and immediately after a standardized bullpen session on day 1; before and immediately after a randomized standardized ULT or SLT session on day 2; and before practice on Day 3. RESULTS: ULT demonstrated significantly greater final ER compared with baseline (+10°; P = 0.05), but did not demonstrate significant IR changes. Similarly, SLT demonstrated significantly greater post-SLT ER (+12°; P = 0.02) and TROM (+12°;P = 0.01) compared with baseline, but no significant IR changes. Final ER measurements were similar between ULT (135° ± 14°) and SLT (138° ± 10°) (P = 0.59). There was also no statistically significant difference in final IR between ULT (51° ± 14°) and SLT (56° ± 8°) (P = 0.27). CONCLUSION: The routine use of postperformance, ULT throwing to recover from range of motion alterations, specifically IR loss, after a pitching session is not superior to standard, SLT throwing. Based on these findings, the choice of postpitching recovery throwing could be player specific based on experience and comfort. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The most effective throwing regimens for enhancing performance and reducing residual impairment are unclear, and ideal recovery and maintenance protocols are frequently debated with little supporting data. Two strategies for throwing shoulder recovery from pitching are SLT and ULT throwing. These are employed to help maintain range of motion and limit IR loss in pitchers. The routine use of ULT throwing for recovery and to limit range of motion alterations after a pitching session is not superior to SLT throwing.

The relationship between shoulder range of motion and elbow stress in college pitchers.

HYPOTHESIS: College pitchers with increased external rotation gain (ERG) produce increased medial elbow torque (elbow stress) whereas those with reduced total rotational range of motion (ROM) have reduced medial elbow torque during pitching. METHODS: Pitchers were recruited from 3 college baseball teams. Players with prior injury or on pitching restrictions because of pain were excluded. Players were evaluated within 2 weeks before their first game of the season. Pitchers completed an intake survey, and shoulder and arm measurements were taken. Pitchers were fitted with a baseball sleeve that included a sensor at the medial elbow. The sensor calculated elbow torque, arm speed, arm slot, and shoulder rotation for each pitch, while a radar gun measured peak ball velocity. After adequate warm-up, pitchers threw 5 fastballs in a standardized manner off the mound at game-speed effort. The primary outcome evaluated the relationship between shoulder ROM and medial elbow torque. Additional outcomes evaluated pitcher characteristics and demographic characteristics in the context of shoulder ROM. RESULTS: Twenty-eight pitchers were included in the preseason analysis. The average age and playing experience were 20.1 years (standard deviation [SD], 1.3 years) and 15.3 years (SD, 1.8 years), respectively, with 2.5 years (SD, 1.2 years) playing at collegiate level. The dominant shoulder showed decreased internal rotation and increased external rotation (ER) relative to the nondominant side (P < .001). The average glenohumeral internal rotation deficit and ERG were 11.3° (SD, 9.87°) and 5.71° (SD, 8.8°), respectively. ERG ≥ 5° was a significant predictor of elbow stress during pitching (47.4 Nm [SD, 0.7 Nm] vs. 45.1 Nm [SD, 0.6 Nm], P = .014). Univariate associations showed that each additional degree of ER resulted in increased elbow torque (ß estimate, 0.35 ± 0.06 Nm; P = .003). Conversely, decreased medial elbow torque was found in pitchers with reduced shoulder ROM (glenohumeral internal rotation deficit ≥ 20°: 43.5 Nm [SD, 1.1 Nm] vs. 46.6 Nm [SD, 0.5 Nm], P = .011; loss of total rotational ROM ≥ 5°: 43.6 Nm [SD, 1.1 Nm] vs. 46.6 Nm [SD, 0.5 Nm], P = .013) and in those with greater arm length (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: College pitchers with increased ER produce greater medial elbow torque during the pitching movement. Each degree of increased ER was found to correlate with increased elbow torque and ball velocity. On the contrary, arm length and reduced shoulder ROM were associated with reduced medial elbow torque. This study suggests that increased ER in pitchers is associated with greater elbow stress during pitching.

Relationship between glenohumeral internal rotation deficit and shoulder conditions in professional baseball pitchers.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported that glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD) may increase the risk of throwing-shoulder injuries. The purpose of this study was to analyze the conditions of the throwing shoulder in professional baseball pitchers with GIRD by comparing with those in pitchers without GIRD. METHODS: In total, 26 male professional baseball pitchers participated in this study. We evaluated passive range of motion (ROM) and isometric muscle strength at internal rotation (IR) and external rotation (ER) at 90° of abduction, as well as the muscle thickness of the supraspinatus (SSP) and infraspinatus (ISP) by ultrasound. The pitchers were divided into 2 groups: those who exhibited a loss of IR of ≥20° in the throwing shoulder (GIRD group) and those who did not (non-GIRD group). RESULTS: In the GIRD group, the total ROM deficit (throwing side - non-throwing side) (P < .001), the muscle thickness ratio (throwing to non-throwing) of the SSP and ISP (P = .017 and P = .014, respectively), and the muscle strength ratio (throwing to non-throwing) of ER (P = .028) were significantly lower than those in the non-GIRD group. In contrast, the muscle strength ratio (throwing to non-throwing) of IR was significantly higher in the GIRD group than in the non-GIRD group (P = .0064). CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that GIRD has significant correlations with several conditions, such as atrophy of the SSP and ISP, weakness of ER strength, enhancement of IR strength, limitation of total ROM, and throwing side, all of which could be important factors for throwing-shoulder injuries.

Correlation of glenohumeral internal rotation deficit with shear wave ultrasound elastography findings for the posterior inferior shoulder capsule in college baseball players.

BACKGROUND: The glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD), primarily caused by the tightness of the posterior capsule, is a major risk factor for shoulder injuries in overhead throwing athletes. Quantitative evaluation of posterior capsular thickness and tightness can help determine the relationship between the posterior inferior capsule and GIRD. One previous study has assessed posterior capsule tightness using shear wave elastography (SWE), in college baseball players; however, it did not address the cutoff value of capsular elasticity that could be considered as abnormal capsular tightness. We aimed to re-evaluate effectiveness of SWE in quantifying posterior shoulder capsule tightness in college baseball players and determine the cutoff value of abnormal capsular elasticity that can predict impending throwing-related shoulder injuries associated with GIRD. METHODS: Twenty-four college baseball players were enrolled in this study. External and internal rotation of the shoulder joint was assessed. The participants were classified into the GIRD group if their throwing shoulder showed >20° of internal rotation loss compared with their nonthrowing shoulder. In a longitudinal ultrasonographic scan of the posterior inferior capsule, shear wave (SW) velocity and thickness were measured at the point nearest to the labrum on both shoulders. RESULTS: Of the 24 subjects, 6 had a GIRD. The mean value of the SW velocity in the throwing shoulder was greater in the GIRD group than in the non-GIRD group (P = .006). The SW velocity difference between the throwing and nonthrowing shoulder was also greater in the GIRD group than in the non-GIRD group (P < .001). There was no significant difference in the thickness of the posterior inferior capsule between both groups. In correlation analysis, the difference in the SW velocity was more strongly correlated with the GIRD than with the SW velocity in the throwing shoulder. When we assume that a 20° GIRD is indicative of a shoulder at risk, the cutoff SW velocity in the throwing shoulder is 4.81 m/s and the SW velocity difference is 0.77 m/s. CONCLUSION: The SW velocity is closely associated with posterior shoulder capsular tightness and may be of quantitative value in baseball players.

Effect of Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit on Shoulder in Baseball Pitchers during Fastball Pitching.

Previous studies have reported that pitchers with glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD) may increase the risk of shoulder injury. However, limited information is available regarding the specific effects of GIRD in baseball pitching. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether baseball pitchers with GIRD change their pitching mechanism. Fifteen baseball pitchers with GIRD and 15 pitchers without GIRD were recruited from university or senior high-school teams. A three-dimensional motion analysis system (Eagle System, Motion Analysis Corporation, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) was used to capture the pitching motion while performing fastball pitches. The kinematics and kinetics of the throwing shoulder and trunk were analyzed based on motion captured data. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to test the differences of the analyzed parameters between two groups. At the instant of ball release, the GIRD group showed lower shoulder external rotation and trunk rotation, and larger shoulder horizontal adduction. In addition, the GIRD group exhibited a significantly larger shoulder inferior force in the cocking and acceleration phase, and a significantly larger internal rotation torque in the acceleration phase. The present results suggested that pitchers with GIRD need stretch training to enlarge joint range of motion, and to improve trunk strength and flexibility to alleviate potential problems associated with pitching in GIRD pitchers.

Clinical Outcomes and Quality of Literature Addressing Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD) can negatively impact shoulder function particularly in the throwing athlete. QUESTIONS/PURPOSE: This study aimed to systematically evaluate recent trends in clinical outcomes and quality of published evidence pertaining to GIRD. METHODS: A systematic review was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and Embase were searched from January 1, 2011, through April 23, 2017, for all articles evaluating GIRD. Two reviewers independently screened articles for eligibility and extracted data for analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-two articles were included in the final review. In general, the overall number of articles published increased over time. Two-thirds of all studies were conducted in the USA. Seventy-eight percent (N = 64) of included studies were level-III to level-V evidence, with no level-I study performed during the study period. Eighty-five percent of studies were either epidemiologic, review, or imaging articles, and only 12% were clinical studies. Significant variability in the clinical definition of GIRD was identified. All studies evaluating non-operative management of GIRD demonstrated significant improvements in internal rotation of the affected extremity. CONCLUSION: Current trends in GIRD-related literature demonstrate limited focus on clinical, therapeutic, or patient-reported outcomes and mostly consist of low-level evidence. There is a lack of consensus in the literature on what clinically constitutes GIRD.

Glenohumeral internal rotation deficit in non-pitcher overhead athletic athletes: case series analysis of ten athletes.

BACKGROUND: The glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD) is diagnosed when there is a loss of 20° of internal rotation compared to the contralateral shoulder. This condition has already been well described in a group of throwing athletes, i.e. baseball pitchers. However, athletic athletes such as javelin throwers, discus throwers, hammer throwers, shot putters may also be susceptible to this condition. Reports are lacking to recognize these symptoms as GIRD for these group of athletes. We aim to evaluate these subgroups of athletes for the possibility of GIRD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined ten athletes (javelin, hammer throwers, and shot putters) for signs of GIRD. Signs of loss of internal rotation were assessed by measuring shoulder range of motion (internal rotation and external rotation) in supine position and posterior shoulder tightness test. Complaints of shoulder pain, evidence of scapular malposition, inferior medial border prominence, coracoid pain and malposition, and dyskinesis of scapular movement (SICK) scapula, posterior shoulder flexibility test were examined. RESULTS: The athletes had a mean training period of 3.8 years. One athlete had complaints of mild pain on their dominant shoulder. Two athletes had GIRD (20° and 25°) with no posterior shoulder tightness. Three athletes had posterior shoulder tightness, but normal total shoulder ROM (195°, 180°, and 185°). Three athletes had increased external rotation (105°, 100°, 125°). No subjects had scapular dyskinesia nor SICK scapula syndrome. All athletes had normal total shoulder ROM. CONCLUSION: Glenohumeral internal rotation deficit could be present in non-pitcher overhead athletics athletes.

Thrower's Exostosis of the Shoulder: A Systematic Review With a Novel Classification.

BACKGROUND: A variety of thrower's exostoses are grouped under the term Bennett lesion, which makes understanding diagnosis and treatment difficult. PURPOSE: To identify all types of reported thrower's and overhead athlete's exostoses and categorize them into a classification system to allow a morphology-based classification. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A systematic review of all articles pertaining to Bennett lesions and thrower's exostosis was performed. The classification and treatments were evaluated to describe the types, proposed causes, diagnosis, and treatment options. RESULTS: A total of 27 studies were included in the systematic review. The anatomic locations referenced in the study demonstrated posteroinferior, posterior, and posterosuperior glenoid lesions. Aggregate radiographic data demonstrated 158 of 306 patients (52%) with a thrower's exostosis of any type and location. Of these 158 patients with a radiographic lesion, 119 (75%) patients were symptomatic. The locations were posteroinferior in 110 patients (70%), directly posterior in 2 patients (1.3%), posterosuperior in 44 patients (28%), and unknown in 2 patients (1.3%). Avulsed lesions were present in 9 (5.7%) posteroinferior lesions, 0 direct posterior lesions, and 2 (1.3%) posterosuperior lesions. Treatment plans included both nonoperative and operative strategies, but operative intervention was more commonly reported for detached lesions. After operative intervention, only 61% of reported athletes returned to preinjury performance. CONCLUSION: Based on a comprehensive review of the literature, we identified several anatomic locations for a thrower's exostosis beyond the classic Bennett lesion. We categorized the reported exostoses into a new classification system for description of location and type (subperiosteal or free fragment) of the thrower's exostosis, which may be used to study future treatments. Current treatment strategies recommend that surgical treatment of thrower's exostosis is considered only after exhausting nonoperative management because reported return to sport is variable after surgery. The effectiveness of excision or repair for both subperiosteal and detached lesions has not been established.

Efficacy of throwing exercise with TheraBand in male volleyball players with shoulder internal rotation deficit: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The Glenohumeral internal-rotation deficit (GIRD) is related to the altered eccentric external-rotator (ER), the concentric internal-rotator (IR), muscle strength, and the ER: IR ratio. GIRD has been documented as a risk factor for shoulder injuries. However, few studies have investigated the effect of an exercise training on these parameters in athletes with GIRD. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of an 8-week throwing exercise with a TheraBand for retraining the rotator cuff on Electromyography (EMG) activity of selected muscles, rotator cuff muscle strength, the glenohumeral (GH) joint IR range of motion (ROM) and GH joint position sense in asymptomatic male volleyball players with GIRD. METHODS: Sixty male volleyball players with GIRD were randomized into either a training group or a control group. The experimental group underwent an 8-week throwing exercise with a TheraBand including 5 sessions of stretching and 3 sessions of strengthening exercises per week. The control group received an active self-exercise program. EMG (onset time and muscle activation), shoulder range of motion (ROMs), strength and GH joint position sense were all assessed pre and post trainings. RESULTS: There were statistically significant within-group differences in the EMG activity of the anterior deltoid (p = 0.005), middle deltoid (p = 0.007), posterior deltoid (p = 0.004), infraspinatus (p = 0.001) and supraspinatus (p = 0.001) muscles, IR ROM (p = 0.001), rotator cuff muscle strength ratio (p = 0.001), and GH joint position sense (p = 0.033) in the experimental group. A 2 × 2 analysis of variance with a mixed model design and independent and paired t-tests were used for statistical analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Throwing exercise with a TheraBand improved shoulder muscle activation, IR ROM, rotator cuff muscle strength ratio and GH joint position sense in participants with GIRD. These findings may improve the treatment of GIRD in a clinical setting. Although the results are significant, further studies should follow up the long-term effects of the Throwing exercise with a TheraBand on GIRD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials using the UMIN-RCT website with ID number of, UMIN000038416 "Retrospectively registered" at 2019/10/29.

Glenohumeral Rotational Deficit and Suprascapular Neuropathy in the Hitting Shoulder in Male Collegiate Volleyball Players.

OBJECTIVE: Repetitive overhead movements stress the dominant shoulder of volleyball players, potentially causing glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD) and suprascapular neuropathy. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of pathological GIRD and suprascapular neuropathy in male collegiate volleyball players. METHODS: We evaluated 22 male collegiate volleyball players and compared the range of motion, the isometric shoulder strength, the thickness of the infraspinatus (ISP) muscle, and the latency and amplitude of the suprascapular nerve [in a nerve conduction study (NCS)] between the hitting and contralateral shoulders. Correlations between the physical findings and each parameter were also determined. RESULTS: The internal rotation angle of the hitting shoulder (55.1±8.7°) was significantly less than that of the contralateral shoulder (64.5±10.2°) (P<0.001); pathological GIRD (≥20°) was found in four players (18.2%). Three players (13.6%) showed abnormal electrophysiological findings of the suprascapular nerve on the ISP muscle in the hitting shoulder. The external-to-internal rotation (ER/IR) torque ratio in the hitting shoulder (99±18%) was significantly lower than that in the contralateral shoulder (106±12%) (P=0.04); no significant differences were observed in ISP muscle thickness or NCS data between the hitting and contralateral shoulders. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of pathological GIRD in male collegiate volleyball players was consistent with that of previous studies. Meanwhile, the prevalence of suprascapular neuropathy was less than that previously reported in high-level volleyball players. Preventive posterior rotator cuff strengthening programs are recommended to correct imbalances between ER and IR in the hitting shoulder, thereby decreasing the risk of shoulder injury.

Shoulder Range of Motion and Baseball Arm Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Arm injuries in baseball players are a common problem. The identification of modifiable risk factors, including range of motion (ROM), is essential for injury prevention. The purpose of this review was to assess the methodologic quality and level of evidence in the literature and to investigate the relationship between shoulder ROM and the risk of arm injuries in baseball players. DATA SOURCES: Relevant studies in PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and SPORTDiscus published from inception to August 1, 2017. STUDY SELECTION: Only studies that encompassed healthy baseball cohorts who were assessed for shoulder ROM and prospectively evaluated for injuries throughout a baseball season or seasons were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Six articles met the search criteria. Only 3 studies were included in the meta-analysis due to disparate participant groups. DATA SYNTHESIS: The modified Downs and Black scale (0-15 points) was used to analyze methodologic quality. Study quality ranged from 11 to 14. Four studies received high-quality (≥12) and 2 studies received moderate-quality (≥10) scores. The overall pooled analysis demonstrated that absolute and internal-rotation deficits (-5.93 [95% confidence interval {CI} = -9.43, -2.43], P < .001 and 4.28 [0.71, 7.86], P = .02, respectively) and absolute total ROM (TROM; -6.19 [95% CI = -10.28, -2.10]; P = .003) were predictors of injury, and these data exhibited homogeneity (absolute IR P value = .77, I2 = 0%; IR deficit P value = .41, I2 = 0%; absolute TROM P value = .78, I2 = 0%). No significance was observed for absolute external rotation (-2.86 [95% CI = -6.56, 0.83], P = .13), which had data with high heterogeneity ( P = .003; I2 = 83%). A deficit in horizontal adduction was a predictor of injury (-8.32 [95% CI = -12.08, -4.56]; P < .001); these data were homogeneous but yielded a moderate heterogenic effect ( P = .16; I2 = 50%). CONCLUSIONS: High-quality evidence demonstrated that deficits in throwing-arm TROM and IR were associated with upper extremity injury in baseball players. Heterogeneity across studies for horizontal adduction suggested that this may be a modifiable risk factor for injury, but it requires further research.